There is no iota of doubt that the modern world is connected through international collaborations and works harmonically. Some echelons of the society subscribe to this belief that the main advantage of the international corporation is in favour of the environment while others hold the view that the main benefit has been in international trade. This essay intends to analyse both perspectives. I personally side with the latter view.
On the one hand, to bolster the
first view several reasons can be presented as follows. To commence with, many
governments have realised the daunting issue of air pollution through vehicles.
In fact, in the past, the European Union has imposed several norms to regulate the
problem and encourage other nations at the G7 summit to follow these ideas. As
a result, the world head showed Euro stage norms in vehicles as from Euro stage
1 and up to 7 which is the latest. Apart from conserving surroundings, the World
environment organisation has done many noticeable activities towards defeat the
issue. Thus, one can take the side of this view for these reasons.
On the
contrary, others have faith in the rewards of multinational trade. To concur with this view, the foremost reason should be the
freedom of enlargement business overseas. To be more precise, multinational
tie-ups open up the market to spread businesses all over the world. For
instance, nowadays brands like Mercedes Audi and Jaguar deal their wagons
everywhere even manufacture in some countries like India. While true for India
also indigenous brands named Allen Solly, Monte Carlo and Peter England have
dominance in the foreign demand.
To sum up and offer my position I
would say both perspectives have true motives. I individually have confidence
in many excellent pieces of business that advanced commercial matters. This has
provided magnificent economical benefits to the world. However, authorities
should also consider planning more benefits for the environment.
No comments:
Post a Comment